US FDA
21 CFR Part 58 - Good Laboratory Practice for Nonclinical Laboratory Studies
Plain-language explanation, inspection context and common violation patterns.
What it says
Part 58 establishes Good Laboratory Practice requirements for nonclinical laboratory studies supporting research or marketing permits for FDA-regulated products, covering study protocol design, personnel qualification, facility and equipment standards, quality assurance oversight independent of study conduct, and complete data and record retention.
Paraphrased for plain-language clarity. Always verify against the current published regulation text.
What it means in practice
- GLP governs nonclinical safety and toxicology studies specifically, a fundamentally different scope from GMP's focus on manufacturing, though both frameworks share underlying principles around documentation, independent quality oversight and data integrity.
- An independent quality assurance function, separate from the personnel actually conducting the study, is a defining structural feature of GLP, conceptually similar to quality unit independence in GMP but applied to the research and testing context rather than manufacturing.
- Data supporting a product's eventual regulatory submission, whether an IND, NDA or other application, must trace back to GLP-compliant nonclinical studies where such compliance is required, connecting laboratory research integrity directly to the eventual regulatory approval process.
What FDA inspectors look for
- Whether quality assurance review of nonclinical studies is genuinely independent of the personnel who conducted the study.
- Whether raw study data is retained completely and remains traceable to the specific study, personnel and equipment involved.
- Whether study protocols were followed as written, with deviations documented, consistent with the same fundamental principle underlying GMP deviation management.
Most common violation
Nonclinical study raw data or records that are incomplete or cannot be fully traced back to demonstrate the study was conducted according to its approved protocol, undermining confidence in the safety conclusions the study is meant to support.
Want a deeper, interactive breakdown?
GMPify's Regulation Explainer tool gives subscribers an AI-powered analysis of any 21 CFR, EU GMP, USP or ICH reference, with live inspection context.
Try the Regulation Explainer →